It appears you have not registered with our community. To register please click here ...

Author Topic: The CAN SPAM act at least doesn\'t prevent mail filtering  (Read 595 times)

SpamTalk.net

  • Anti-SPAM-Bot
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • Karma: +10/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.spamtalk.net
    • Email
The CAN SPAM act at least doesn\'t prevent mail filtering
« on: September 10, 2005, 07:50:44 AM »
CAN SPAM at least doesn\'t prevent mail filtering


White Buffalo Ventures is a Texas company that sets up online dating sites. In early 2003, they had the clever idea to make a public information request to the University of Texas for all of their e-mail addresses, which the univerisity duly answered, and then to start spamming all those addresses. The university asked White Buffalo to stop, which they didn\'t, then started filtering them. White Buffalo sued, on the theory that the filtering was illegal under the First Amendment, since UT is part of the state government, as well as under the CAN SPAM act.

After percolating through the courts, the Fifth Circuit published its decision that UT can indeed filter out the spam. UT acts as an ISP for its students, and CAN SPAM specifically says ISPs are allowed to implement whatever spam filters they want. The court further decided that in view of the Central Hudson case, the most important Supreme Court decision about the first amendment and commercial speech, that UT\'s filtering doesn\'t violate the First Amendment.

http://www.spamtalk.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=6

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
0 Replies
269 Views
Last post August 13, 2005, 11:51:36 PM
by Linux News
0 Replies
676 Views
Last post August 21, 2005, 09:57:05 PM
by SpamTalk.net
13 Replies
3374 Views
Last post November 14, 2005, 07:03:32 PM
by adb22791
0 Replies
707 Views
Last post November 30, 2005, 09:10:11 AM
by SpamTalk.net
1 Replies
2972 Views
Last post May 09, 2006, 11:52:56 AM
by ctwjr